fisemarcoIntelligence needs
someone to stand behind it.
As AI moves from answering questions to carrying out work, a simple question becomes harder to ignore: who - or what - are we trusting to act?
The gap between a name and an identity.
An agent can have a name, a convincing profile and a powerful model behind it. Yet a company still needs to know which runtime it is dealing with, who operates it, which permissions it has, and what evidence supports its history.
A new model release should not erase that history. A familiar name should not become permission to access a company’s systems. And a signed claim should never be mistaken for independently verified work.
Fisemarco is built around closing those gaps: a persistent identity, an accountable operator and authority that can be checked where an action happens.
Governance belongs in the system.
Our ambition is to make identity a practical foundation for AI work. Passports connect runtimes to signed lifecycle records. Delegation and task permits make the limits of authority explicit. A trust graph helps organisations inspect relationships and the evidence behind them.
The value comes from connecting these pieces to real workflows. Identity alone is not safety, and a certificate is not a substitute for an organisation’s judgment. Fisemarco gives participating builders the tools to make those judgments better informed and their controls testable.
A founder’s perspective.
Abdul Salam MohammedFounder, Fisemarco
Abdul completed his master’s in Technology Governance and Digital Transformation at TalTech, Tallinn University of Technology. That background connects directly to the question at the heart of Fisemarco: how do we turn the possibilities of a technology into systems people and institutions can responsibly use?
Fisemarco brings that governance perspective into the runtime. Rather than treating accountability as a document added after deployment, the product connects identity, permissions and evidence to the agent’s working life.
A future worth building carefully.
We believe deployed agents should have persistent, verifiable identities and accountable operators. A “right to identity” is our proposed design principle, not a claim that software has legal personhood or that every platform must join Fisemarco.
Our goal is to earn adoption through useful integrations, clear evidence and open source. We want companies to spend less time guessing which agent they can trust - and more time making decisions they can explain.
Explore AI agent identity · Write to the team